• Welcome to the Chevereto User Community!

    Here, users from all over the world come together to learn, share, and collaborate on everything related to Chevereto. It's a place to exchange ideas, ask questions, and help improve the software.

    Please keep in mind:

    • This community is user-driven. Always be polite and respectful to others.
    • Support development by purchasing a Chevereto license, which also gives you priority support.
    • Go further by joining the Community Subscription for even faster response times and to help sustain this space
  • Chevereto Support CLST

    Support response

    Support checklist

    • Got a Something went wrong message? Read this guide and provide the actual error. Do not skip this.
    • Confirm that the server meets the System Requirements
    • Check for any available Hotfix - your issue could be already reported/fixed
    • Read documentation - It will be required to Debug and understand Errors for a faster support response

Compliance with the beta rules

DeCysos

DeCysos

Phoenix Foto Service
Rodolfo said:
  • Keep it private. Betas are private, don't share the code with any third-party.
  • Keep it here. Any beta-related issued must be handled under the Beta program category, keep all beta-stuff away from the rest of the community
Click to expand...
If I write a bug in the beta forum, it should stay here.
In my case, two topics have been moved to the public area because the error also applies to the older version.

But still I'm not happy with it, precisely because the two points regulate that are probably valid for ALL.

Why does it annoy me?
Because nobody is concerned with anything like the link to the beta version.
I have removed the links & version number from the threads concerned.

I am not testing the live version but the beta version. For this reason, I have not written publicly.
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
If you use a beta, you report the issues to the beta channel. Everything OK until this point.

My opinion is that if you publish a beta issue that wasn't triggered by the beta I think that it shouldn't keep being "private" to the beta testers. Users have the right to know the software bugs on time, and we shouldn't hide that information only because it was found in a beta installation. Besides, who stop other beta tester to spread your URL everywhere? We can't control that so any sensitive link should be using privacy (password protected directories, password gate, etc).

I think that is safer to assume that this beta program has lots of communication issues, mostly caused by the use of a forum system to try to drive software development. Ideally you should be able to post public/private bits and keep public the non-sensitive information. But we have this, and we have to deal wit it.

In any case, for future topics being moved to the public forums I will confirm the bug and ask to edit before move the topic.

Cheers,
Rodolfo.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top