Hi there,
Just a quick question:
Would there be any issues, now or in the foreseeable future, with using the root directory as the image directory. I mean, instead of storing your images in /images or /i, for example, could they simply be stored in / ?
I have a very short URL, say xx.xx, and instead of images being saved like http://xx.xx/i/3kdf4.jpg, I'd like them saved like http://xx.xx/3kdf4.jpg. Something like Imgur, I guess (I know Imgur uses multiple servers, i.e. images are saved in http://i.imgur.com instead of http://imgur.com).
If the site got large I suppose this could become an issue, even if just with regards to tidiness?
Thanks.
Just a quick question:
Would there be any issues, now or in the foreseeable future, with using the root directory as the image directory. I mean, instead of storing your images in /images or /i, for example, could they simply be stored in / ?
I have a very short URL, say xx.xx, and instead of images being saved like http://xx.xx/i/3kdf4.jpg, I'd like them saved like http://xx.xx/3kdf4.jpg. Something like Imgur, I guess (I know Imgur uses multiple servers, i.e. images are saved in http://i.imgur.com instead of http://imgur.com).
If the site got large I suppose this could become an issue, even if just with regards to tidiness?
Thanks.