• Welcome to the Chevereto user community!

    Here users from all over the world gather around to learn the latest about Chevereto and contribute with ideas to improve the software.

    Please keep in mind:

    • 😌 This community is user driven. Be polite with other users.
    • 👉 Is required to purchase a Chevereto license to participate in this community (doesn't apply to Pre-sales).
    • 💸 Purchase a Pro Subscription to get access to active software support and faster ticket response times.

auto put images to moderation if nudes are spotted

J

JakeSully

👽 Chevereto Freak
💡Describe your suggestion

add so when you upload a nudity picture into a album, then whole album will be locked and that it changes album preview image into a pending moderation image and that album is invisible. Once the moderator/admin approves it, the album and images will be viewable again and that album preview image will be back to it's image it was before. If moderator/admin deny it, then images + album becomes deleted.

👏Where did you saw this?

i saw this at http://imgsrc.ru/

🔥Interest outside our community

Don't have any atm
 
tomsit said:
Check out this guide by @teejam

https://chevereto.com/community/thr...-for-nudity-detection-tagging-and-more.10046/

It will automatically detect nudes and mark them as NSFW.
Click to expand...

thanks that could be useful in one way, but i still think chevereto should have it's own built in auto detection. That it actually puts images in how i wrote, so it is 100% not seen until moderator/admin approves it or so. By using one you linked it only puts it as NSFW, but still can be seen if you click in profile to show NSFW content. Reason why i want my idea is to avoid content that are illegal to be seen such as child pornography and other illegal images.

Also amazon one isn't free, only first year but then it costs. So i stil suggest chevereto to have it's own free auto detection function.
 
Last edited:
JakeSully said:
i still think chevereto should have it's own built in auto detection
Click to expand...
It will be awesome, but we are limited to the technology we can use. Image recognition APIs are still too new and having them self-hosted is still something not feasible in the short term. This article may be useful: https://dataturks.com/blog/image-moderation-api-comparison.php

Eventually, there should be a self-hosted solution for this but I don't know that it will be cheap to run. Image processing eats a lot and these guys have buildings filled with high-end hardware, they can compute way cheaper than anyone else really.
 
Rodolfo said:
It will be awesome, but we are limited to the technology we can use. Image recognition APIs are still too new and having them self-hosted is still something not feasible in the short term. This article may be useful: https://dataturks.com/blog/image-moderation-api-comparison.php

Eventually, there should be a self-hosted solution for this but I don't know that it will be cheap to run. Image processing eats a lot and these guys have buildings filled with high-end hardware, they can compute way cheaper than anyone else really.
Click to expand...
well still cheaper to have self hosted function, so you don't have to pay alot for an api one.
 
What you don't pay in the actual service, you will pay it in hardware resources. For huge websites it will be a deal breaker, but for small websites it will be the best thing that we could throw to the software.

Let's just hope that image recognition moves towards self-hosted 🙌
 
Rodolfo said:
What you don't pay in the actual service, you will pay it in hardware resources. For huge websites it will be a deal breaker, but for small websites it will be the best thing that we could throw to the software.

Let's just hope that image recognition moves towards self-hosted 🙌
Click to expand...
That isn't a problem for me :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top