• Welcome to the Chevereto user community!

    Here users from all over the world gather around to learn the latest about Chevereto and contribute with ideas to improve the software.

    Please keep in mind:

    • 😌 This community is user driven. Be polite with other users.
    • 👉 Is required to purchase a Chevereto license to participate in this community (doesn't apply to Pre-sales).
    • 💸 Purchase a Pro Subscription to get access to active software support and faster ticket response times.
  • Chevereto Support CLST

    Support response

    Support checklist

    • ⚠️ Got a Something went wrong message? Read this guide and provide the actual error. Do not skip this.
    • ✅ Confirm that the server meets the System Requirements
    • 🔥 Check for any available Hotfix - your issue could be already reported/fixed
    • 📚 Read documentation - It will be required to Debug and understand Errors for a faster support response

apache vs. nginx

phantomd

phantomd

Chevereto Member
Hello together
to run a high frequented website, it's aswell important to take the most out of your hardware. I made some tests to compare apche vs. nginx. The following test is to deliver a simple index.html with the content hello world

I use the tool ab with the following parameters to perform the test: ab -n 10000 -c 100 it simulate 10000 requests with 100 parallel connections. here are the results

Apache
apache.jpg
Nginx
nginx.jpg
as you can see nginx performs approx 2529 req/sek more than apache. Aswell the needed Time per request is nginx faster. This is only a overview about the webserver, with large sites there are many many more things to consiter for example the write rates of the sql database behind. If you would run a multiserver node in future i would suggest to use apache as portal server and nginx on the store servers. nginx is famous to deliver static content. Here a example how your multiserver installation could be:
test.jpg
I hope that chevereto 3 will work like this. The user will reach the portal server. Each upload a user make will be stored per roundrobin on each server behind in the cluster. So if there is a image request it would be delivered directly from the cluster servers behind:)

I hope my littel overview is helpfull

cheers

phantomd
 
local_nginx_lighty_gwan_100k.png


Sorry :D
 
did you already setup gwan ? i am quite sure gwan is a intresting webserver for certain projects, but for static files nginx scores betters. Based on the explanation of fabi from youporn, all thumbs from youporn will be delivered by a nginx cluster. and if it works for youporn it works aswell for pixhost;)
 
The multiserver setup will be just like that. By the way, you should test LiteSpeed (Chevereto.com runs on litespeed).
 
Hi Rodolfo
Thank you for your feedback, and it's nice to hear that the multiserver setup will work exactly like that. I have already tested litespeed, but my personal fav is still nginx, but i think it depends on your personal mood, for example in our company one of our sysadmins only love apache, you can't discuss with him about nginx, i am love nginx, because i saw live what nginx can and which power it has:) i can't wait until chevereto 3 is released to start :) i hope there will be some new screenshots of the system soon
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top