-
Welcome to the Chevereto user community!
Here users from all over the world gather around to learn the latest about Chevereto and contribute with ideas to improve the software.
Please keep in mind:
- 😌 This community is user driven. Be polite with other users.
- 👉 Is required to purchase a Chevereto license to participate in this community (doesn't apply to Pre-sales).
- 💸 Purchase a Pro Subscription to get access to active software support and faster ticket response times.
Storage
- Thread starter Barry
- Start date
Barry
💖 Chevereto Fan
Agreed, just thought I could kick start a discussion on pros/cons of various providers, along with performance, cost, etc.
armory
Chevereto Member
S3 compatible storage is a scalable option and has a low upfront cost.
I am hesitating between BackBlaze B2 and Cloudflare R2.
In my case, they cost about the same. The factor that influenced my choice was performance, but I don't have a good way to test them.😿
If one day my instance can grow to be very big, I would use local storage.
To be more precise, maybe a dedicated server run an intranet NFS service and mounted it on the web server.
Any object storage is much slower than local storage when uploading images.
Of course, the above only exists in my imagination, maybe NFS is not a good solution.
I am hesitating between BackBlaze B2 and Cloudflare R2.
In my case, they cost about the same. The factor that influenced my choice was performance, but I don't have a good way to test them.😿
If one day my instance can grow to be very big, I would use local storage.
To be more precise, maybe a dedicated server run an intranet NFS service and mounted it on the web server.
Any object storage is much slower than local storage when uploading images.
Of course, the above only exists in my imagination, maybe NFS is not a good solution.